The Psychology of a White-Collar Criminal: Are they born or made?

Most of us like to believe we would never commit a crime. We associate criminal behavior with desperation, violence, or a lack of moral integrity. But what if the line between right and wrong isn’t as clear-cut as we think? What if, under the right circumstances, even highly educated, successful professionals could rationalize fraud?

White-collar criminals don’t fit the stereotypical image of lawbreakers. They aren’t masked robbers or street-level con artists. Instead, they are CEOs, executives, and financial professionals - people who command respect and trust. They wear suits, not handcuffs. Yet, their crimes can destroy lives, wipe out savings, and destabilize entire economies. So, what pushes them to cross the line? Are they wired differently from the rest of us, or do they simply succumb to pressure, greed, and opportunity?

Psychologists have long debated whether certain personality traits make someone more likely to commit financial crimes. Many convicted white-collar criminals share characteristics from the “Dark Triad” of personality traits: narcissism, which fuels a belief that they deserve success at any cost, Machiavellianism, which makes them skilled at manipulation and deception, and psychopathy, which allows them to act without remorse. Bernie Madoff, who orchestrated the largest Ponzi scheme in history, used his charm and confidence to deceive even seasoned investors. Elizabeth Holmes, despite knowing her technology was flawed, continued to mislead investors and patients to keep her company afloat. Their stories suggest that some individuals may have psychological tendencies that make fraud seem not only tempting but justifiable.

Yet, not all white-collar criminals fit this mold. Many start their careers ethically but gradually find themselves making small moral compromises. Financial misconduct often begins with minor rule-bending - skewing a report, tweaking numbers, or making a “temporary” financial adjustment to meet expectations. Over time, as these actions go unpunished, they become habitual, and the justifications grow stronger. The pressure to perform, particularly in high-stakes corporate environments, also plays a major role. Employees and executives

often face unrealistic targets, intense competition, and the fear of failure. In these situations, ethical lapses can feel like the only way to survive.

One of the most insidious aspects of white-collar crime is the way offenders rationalize their actions. Unlike violent criminals, they rarely see themselves as bad people. Instead, they tell themselves that “everyone does it", that they’ll “fix it later”, or that they’re simply “playing the game".

This self-deception allows them to commit fraud while maintaining a positive

self-image. Adding to the problem is the fact that white-collar crimes are often lightly punished. Unlike street crimes, which carry immediate and severe consequences, financial fraud is often met with settlements, fines, or relatively short prison sentences. This lack of accountability reinforces the idea that fraud is a risk worth taking.

---

So, are white-collar criminals born or made? The answer lies somewhere in between. While certain personality traits may make individuals more prone to unethical behavior, most financial criminals are shaped by their environments. Corporate culture, financial pressures,and the gradual erosion of ethical boundaries all contribute to their descent into fraud. Understanding this psychology is key to preventing financial crime. Stronger regulations, ethical leadership, and a culture of accountability can disrupt the cycle before small moral compromises turn into large-scale deception. If most white-collar criminals are made, perhaps they can also be unmade.

CC: Aleksandra Kostanecka